
On Tuesday, August 6, 1996, a team of scientists at Johnson Space Center led by David S. McKay, a veteran of studying lunar rocks from the Apollo program, described their evidence that microscopic fossils, resembling ancient Earth bacteria were found in a meteorite recovered from Antarctica back in 1984. Daniel Goldin, the head of NASA, is quoted in the Washington Post ( Wednesday, August 7, page A4) as saying that "NASA has made a startling discovery" calling it "exciting, compelling but not as yet conclusive". The full technical document was published in the prestigious journal Science a week later.
What is all the excitement about?
In a hastily convened press conference at 1 PM on Wednesday at NASA headquarters in Washington, D.C., and in the press releases I have read, the story goes something like this.
In 1984 a meteorite was recovered from Antarctica, designated ALH84001. It was a 4.5 pound, 1.9 kilogram stone, whose age has been estimated to be near 4.6 billion years. Isotopic analysis later established that, along with 11 other rocks found in Antarctica, ALH84001 was from Mars. It is the oldest of the 12 meteorites, the youngest of which is only a few 100 million years old. ALH84001 was ejected from Mars perhaps 16 million years ago, and about 13,000 years ago found its way to Earth and Antarctica. It was discovered in 1984, classified and archived for later research.
During the last 2.5 years, scientists at NASA's Johnson Space Center meticulously analyzed a small piece from this meteorite, performing an intensive chemical, mineralogical and microscopic assay on this sample. They found that there were orange 'carbonaceous globules' embedded in the matrix of the rock with sizes of about 250 microns. This was not a new discovery, and a description of these globules has appeared several times in the technical journals already. The team states that globules such as these have not been found in other meteoritic samples, so they are of themselves very unusual and warrant investigation for this reason alone.
Sophisticated mass spectroscopy of a portion of the meteorite, shaved micron thin and including several of these globules, were then performed. The first new result is that these globules were found to coincide with enhanced traces of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon molecules. These 'PAH's are organic molecules, however, there are many inorganic processes that produce them in the interstellar medium and in the atmospheres of cool stars. Astronomers have detected PAH lines in the infrared from many different, dusty, sites in the Milky Way. The association of the PAH molecules with the carbonaceous globules is, however, rather peculiar.
The orange globules have what appears to be an outer surface that alternates black-white-black. A mineralogic assay of this surface reveals the presence of magnetite, gregite and pyrrhotite minerals. The gregite and pyrrhotite minerals are iron sulfites. The shapes of the magnetite and pyrrhotite mineral 'crystals' bare a striking resemblance to organically-produced magnetite and pyrrhotite crystals which are either cubic or tear drop shaped.
The globules were photographed using a scanning electron microscope, and it is this evidence that is visually the most intriguing. The globules appeared to be covered by a fine surface with many elongated bodies exposed, or partially embedded, in the carbonate-rich material. The longest of these are 200 nano-meters long, and the smallest are about 100 times smaller than the smallest known Earth micro-fossils recovered from 3.8 billion years old Australian rocks. They resemble, in appearance, images of Earth nano-bacteria on calcium carbonate. The basaltic deposits taken from core samples in the Columbia River basin also show sub-surface bacterial colonies from depths of 2 kilometers that resemble the purported martial micro-fossils.
The team admits up front that they have no confirming evidence of cell walls, or a chemistry for the micro-fossils that is uniquely biologic in origin. They argue, however, that the same careful criteria used to confirm the existence of ancient Earth micro-fossils, when applied to the Mars sample, leaves open the possibility that what they are seeing is the following scenario:
About 4 billion years ago, there was abundant water on Mars as we can see from geologic features imaged by the Viking Orbiter. The oceans, perhaps up to several hundred meters deep, were rich in calcium carbonate, and this material precipitated out as the globules we see in ALH84001. These globules lodged themselves in fissures and crevasses within an older rock that had solidified about 0.8 billion years earlier. At about the same time, there were martian nano-bacteria present, swarming over the condensing globules, and in many instances becoming entombed in the globules as they grew. Then after billions of years, a body impacted Mars and ejected some of the rock in which the globules were encased. This happened about 16 million years ago, and the sample finally impacted the Earth about 13,000 years ago.
In the news conference, UCLAs Prof. Bill Schopf provided a rebuttle to these claims by emphasizing that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" as Carl Sagan often states.
The team acknowledges that each of their threads of evidence are not conclusive, but that taken together they add up to a plausible and even convincing story that they have detected micro-fossils in martian rock.
To resolve this issue further there are several things that must be done in follow-up research. They must examine the small micro-fossils embedded within the globules and confirm that they have fossil cell walls and organic molecule traces similar to ancient Earth bacterial fossils. They should be able to identify examples of the life cycles of these organisms as can be done in Earth bacterial fossils from 3.8 billion years ago. There should be evidence of intermediate 'budding' stages. The issue of the formation temperature of the globules has to be clarified and shown to be consistent with a low-temperature process involving water, not a high-temperature phase involving the re-crystallization of rock matrix after the martian impact.
In Daniel Goldin's introduction to the press conference, in subsequent comments during the Q/A period, and by the admission of all parties present, the bottom line is that the findings were at least superficially consistent with the idea that martian micro-fossils had been discovered, BUT, that much more scientific investigation needs to be done to reinforce this as the only consistent interpretation of the data. Goldin has proposed stepping-up the NASA activities for landing a rover on Mars ca 2005 with sample-return capabilities. You should also be aware that since before the landing of the Viking spacecraft in 1976, there has been an active scientific community exploring Exobiology and the Origin of Life. There is lots of info on the internet about this.
There are significant alternate interpretations to each line of evidence presented, which make a plausible case for martian micro-fossils not being real. They could be unfamiliar re-crystallizations produced by the impact that launched the rock sample to earth. The definitive evidence will be to discover that the small bodies embedded in the globules are hollow, just as the ancient Earth bacterial fossils are.
In a 2000 paper presented by A. Tremain
Treiman A. H. Ancient martian life in Allan Hills 84001? Status of some current controversies.There is no agreement about the formation temperature of the ALH 84001 carbonates, hosts to possible signs of martian biota. Estimates range from ~700°C to ~0°C, with identical data commonly interpreted to mean both high and low T. Treiman feels that the bulk of evidence suggests T < 400°C, with little evidence of whether T was cool enough for life as we know it. McKay et al. (1996) reported organic matter, PAHs, in ALH 84001; that finding has been confirmed. It is not clear, however, if these PAHs are martian or are terrestrial contaminants; most or all of the other organic matter in ALH 84001 is terrestrial. If the PAHs are martian, they could have formed without biology. Bacteria-shaped objects (BSOs) were identified as possible fossilized martian bacteria (McKay et al., 1996), and that claim is disputed. Various BSOs have been claimed to be magnetite crystals, mineral surface irregularities, and artifacts of sample preparation. In addition, Earth bacteria and fungi are now known to inhabit martian meteorites (Steele et al., 1998).
The hypothesis that ALH 84001 contains traces of ancient martian biota has not been proved or disproved at this time.
Copyright 1997 Dr. Sten Odenwald
Return to Ask the Astronomer.